AskLexi gives federal litigators and legal researchers AI-powered access to every federal district court docket, filing, and judge — so you can build stronger arguments, faster.
Who AskLexi Is For
Whether you're preparing for a motion hearing, evaluating a case for litigation, or tracking a competitor's federal docket — AskLexi is the research layer that federal practitioners rely on.
Instantly pull docket histories, read AI-generated filing summaries, and research your assigned judge's ruling patterns — all before your first status conference.
Search across every federal district court by party, counsel, docket number, or keyword. Surface relevant cases and precedents without wading through PACER's interface.
Monitor federal litigation exposure with real-time case alerts. Track cases naming your company, industry peers, or regulatory targets with daily AI-briefed digests.
Your Federal Research Workflow
AskLexi replaces hours of PACER searches and manual document review with an AI-assisted workflow designed for how federal litigators actually prepare.
Search by party name, attorney, docket number, or keyword across all 94 federal district courts. Access over 1 billion PACER-sourced documents without the clunky government interface.
"What are the pending motions?" "Has the court ruled on class certification?" "What's the damages theory?" Ask Lexi any question and get sourced answers drawn directly from the docket filings.
Research the judge assigned to your case — grant rates on summary judgment, average time to ruling, financial disclosures, and notable prior decisions. Walk into the courtroom prepared.
Set real-time alerts on any federal case. When a new filing hits the docket — a motion, order, or judgment — you'll get an email with an AI-generated summary of what changed. Never be the last to know.
Experience AskLexi on real court cases — no sign up required
Court: S.D. Fla.Docket: 9:23-cr-80101
Ask Lexi anything about the classified documents case
United States v. Trump (Case No. 9:23-cr-80101) is a landmark federal criminal prosecution filed in the Southern District of Florida before Judge Aileen Cannon. The case centers on the alleged willful retention of classified national defense information at Mar-a-Lago following the end of the Trump presidency in January 2021. Special Counsel Jack Smith led the prosecution, presenting evidence of over 300 classified documents discovered during an FBI search in August 2022. The indictment alleged violations of the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. § 793), obstruction of justice, and conspiracy charges. Documents allegedly included military attack plans, nuclear weapons information, and intelligence sources. The case was dismissed by Judge Cannon in July 2024 on grounds that the Special Counsel's appointment violated the Appointments Clause, a decision currently under appeal.
Key Events
Try Asking
"What charges were filed?"
"Why was the case dismissed?"
"What documents were at Mar-a-Lago?"
More Demo Cases
E.D.N.Y.
United States v. George Santos (Case No. 1:23-cr-00234) is a federal criminal prosecution in the Eastern District of New York charging former U.S. Representative George Santos with wire fraud, money laundering, aggravated identity theft, and falsifying records. Santos represented New York's 3rd Congressional District from January 2023 until his expulsion in December 2023. The indictment alleges Santos defrauded donors through fake political committees, charged credit cards without authorization for personal luxury purchases, and stole identities to file fraudulent unemployment claims during COVID-19. The superseding indictment expanded charges to 23 counts. Santos pleaded guilty in August 2024 to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, facing potential prison sentences. The case highlighted campaign finance violations and fraudulent claims about his background, education, and work history.
Supreme Court
NVIDIA Corporation v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB (Docket No. 22-970) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court securities fraud case examining the pleading standards for scienter under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Swedish investment fund E. Ohman alleged NVIDIA misrepresented gaming revenue by concealing that significant sales stemmed from cryptocurrency mining during the 2017-2018 crypto boom. When crypto markets crashed, NVIDIA's stock dropped over 28%. The case addresses whether plaintiffs adequately alleged that CEO Jensen Huang and CFO Colette Kress knowingly or recklessly misled investors about the source of revenue. The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal, finding plaintiffs sufficiently alleged scienter through internal reports and channel checks. The Supreme Court's decision will impact securities class actions nationwide by clarifying what evidence plaintiffs must present at the pleading stage to show executives intended to deceive investors.
N.D. Cal.
Federal criminal prosecution of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes for wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud involving investors and patients.
Judge Analytics
Every federal litigator knows: the judge matters. AskLexi provides AI-powered analytics on every active federal judge — ruling tendencies, financial disclosures, and case-type experience — so you can tailor your strategy from day one.
Research a JudgeN.D. California
MSJ Grant Rate
40%
Avg. Time to Ruling
45 days
Simple Pricing
Everything a federal litigator needs — unlimited docket searches, judge analytics, AI case analysis, and case monitoring — at one transparent price.
Unlimited federal case searches
AI-powered case analysis & Q&A
Full judge analytics for every federal judge
10 LexAlert case monitors included
Daily email digests with AI summaries
Extra LexAlerts $9.99/mo each